Q1672
In which of the following cases it was held that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is constitutionally valid because there is presumption of constitutionality of an Act of Parliament?
A.
Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT (2009) 111 DRJ 1
B.
Suresh Kumar Kaushal v. Naz Foundation, (2014) 1 SCC 1
AnswerC.
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, Writ petition (criminal) no. 76 of 2016
D.
K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, Writ petition (criminal) no. 494 of 2012
Answer: Option B
Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question Let's Discuss on Board