Q104
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that First information Report (FIR) was not substantive evidence and could only be used to corroborate its maker?
A.
Anil Kumar v. B. S. Neelakanta, AIR 2010 SC 2715
B.
Viveta Gazra v. State, AIR 2010 SC 2712
C.
Union of India v. A. Kumar, AIR 2010 SC 2735
D.
C. Magesh v. State of Karnaiaka, AIR 2010 SC 2768
AnswerAnswer: Option D
Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question Let's Discuss on Board