Q961
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of India held that the rule of prudence requires that the evidence of an accomplice should ordinarily be corroborated by some other evidence:
A.
Francis Stanly v. Intelligence Officer, AIR 2007 SC 794
AnswerB.
Youaraj Rai v. Chander Bahadur Karki, AIR 2007 SC 561
C.
Kamla Devi v. Khushal Kanuiar, AIR 2007 SC 663
D.
Bablu v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 2006 SC 115
Answer: Option A
Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question Let's Discuss on Board