Q897
Match the cases mentioned in List I with legal issues mentioned in List II and select the correct answer using the given below: List I List II a. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddy 1. Right of a daughter to reopen the partition is valid b. John Vallamatom v. UOI 2. A Hindu having a daughter under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 c. R. Kantha v. UOI 3. Limited estate of a woman becomes absolute estate d. Sandhya v. Union of India 4. Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is unconstitutional
Match the cases mentioned in List I with legal issues mentioned in List II and select the correct answer using the given below:
| List I | List II |
| a. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddy | 1. Right of a daughter to reopen the partition is valid |
| b. John Vallamatom v. UOI | 2. A Hindu having a daughter under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 |
| c. R. Kantha v. UOI | 3. Limited estate of a woman becomes absolute estate |
| d. Sandhya v. Union of India | 4. Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is unconstitutional |
A.
a-2, b-4, c-1, d-3
B.
a-3, b-4, c-2, d-1
C.
a-4, b-3, c-1, d-2
D.
a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2
AnswerAnswer: Option D
Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question Let's Discuss on Board