Q887
Possession of a manager cannot be treated as ostensible ownership with the consent of the real owner. This was held in case of:
A.
Seshumulla M. Shah v. Sayed Abdul Rashid, AIR 1991 Kant 273
AnswerB.
Ved Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1989 NOC 136
C.
Motimul Sowvar v. Vijalakshi Ammal, AIR 1965 Mad 432
D.
B. Sitaram Rao v. Bibhushana, AIR 1978 Ori 222
Answer: Option A
Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question Let's Discuss on Board