Q844
"The DNA test cannot rebut the conclusive presumption envisaged under section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act. The parties can avoid the rigor of such conclusive presumption only by providing non-access which is a negative proof." It was so held in which case
A.
Somwanti v. State of Punjab, AIR 1963 SC 151
B.
Siddaramesh v. State of Karnataka, (2010) 3 SCC 152
C.
Kailash v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2007 SC 107
D.
Shaik Fakruddin v. Shaik Mohammad Hasan, AIR 2006 AP 48
AnswerAnswer: Option D
Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question Let's Discuss on Board