Q1817
Which of the following is incorrect under the Evidence Act?
A.
In a case where 'A' is charged with receiving a particular stolen wristwatch knowing the same to be stolen-The fact that at the same time he was in possession of other such stolen articles is relevant
B.
In a case where 'A' is tried for the murder of 'B' by intentionally shooting him to death-The fact that 'A' was in the habit of shooting at people with intent to murder them is relevant
AnswerC.
In a case where 'A' is sued for damages for bite injury caused by his dog to 'B', 'A' having known the dog to be ferocious-The fact that the dog had previously bitten 'X', 'Y' and 'Z' is relevant
D.
In a case where 'A' is accused of defaming 'B' by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of 'B'-The fact of previous publications by 'A' respecting 'B', showing ill-will on the part of 'A' towards 'B' is relevant
Answer: Option B
Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question Let's Discuss on Board