. . . . . . . . is much more difficult because it's necessary to determine a supervised strategy to train a model for each feature and, finally, to predict their value
8 observations are clustered into 3 clusters using K-Means clustering algorithm. After first iteration clusters, C1, C2, C3 has following observations:
C1: {(2,2), (4,4), (6,6)}
C2: {(0,4), (4,0),(2,5)}
C3: {(5,5), (9,9)}
What will be the cluster centroids if you want to proceed for second iteration?
We have been given a dataset with n records in which we have input attribute as x and output attribute as y. Suppose we use a linear regression method to model this data. To test our linear regressor, we split the data in training set and test set randomly. Now we increase the training set size gradually. As the training set size increases, what do you expect will happen with the mean training error?
Suppose we fit "Lasso Regression" to a data set, which has 100 features (X1,X2...X100). Now, we rescale one of these feature by multiplying with 10 (say that feature is X1), and then refit Lasso regression with the same regularization parameter. Now, which of the following option will be correct?
Suppose on performing reduced error pruning, we collapsed a node and observed an improvement in the prediction accuracy on the validation set. Which among the following statements are possible in light of the performance improvement observed? (a) The collapsed node helped overcome the effect of one or more noise affected data points in the training set (b) The validation set had one or more noise affected data points in the region corresponding to the collapsed node (c) The validation set did not have any data points along at least one of the collapsed branches (d) The validation set did have data points adversely affected by the collapsed node