In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court has held that "The Arbitration and Conciliation Act", 1996 has been drafted according to the UNCITRAL model law. The Act and the model law are however not identical and therefore the judgements and the literature thereon cannot be taken as a guide to the interpretation of the Act, 1996:
A Financial Institution institutes a suit for re-possession of a vehicle subject matter of Hire Purchase Agreement with the defendant and for recovery of hire charges. The Hire Purchase Agreement produced by the plaintiff along with the plaint contains an arbitration clause for reference of such claims to arbitration of a reputed named advocate. The court shall:
A Hindu wife files a petition against her husband for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce. Immediately after service of summons of the petition and before the filing of written statement the defendant files an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act for reference to arbitration in accordance with the arbitration clause in a Settlement Agreement signed by the parties when on an earlier occasion police complaints were made against each other. The wife admits the Arbitration Agreement which encompasses all disputes and differences of any kind between the parties. The Court shall:
Consider the following statements.
(1) The Arbitral Tribunal cannot rule on its own jurisdiction.
(2) Oral arbitration agreement is enforceable.
(3) The parties may choose med-arb as the procedure for settlement of their dispute.
(4) There must be a pre-existing written agreement of arbitration for dispute settlement by arbitration.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?