A revokes his proposal made to B by telegram. Under Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the revocation is complete as against A when the telegram is . . . . . . . .
Match List I containing with List II containing the important principles used in deciding these cases and choose the correct options from the given below:
List-I
List-II
a. Durga Prasad v. Baldeo
1. The other party has done nothing in response to unilateral promise and hence no consideration.
b. Abudl Aziz v. Masum Ali
2. No stranger to the consideration can take advantage of a contract, although made for his benefit.
c. Dutton v. Poole
3. Act was not done at the desire of the promisor and hence no consideration.
d. Tweddle v. Atkinson
4. The agreement may be enforced by the third person for whose benefit the agreement was made.
A quantum merit claim might arise in situations some of which are contractual and others quasi-contractual. The plaintiff entered into an agreement to write for a periodical and, as per the agreement, he was to receive a lump sum amount on the completion of the work. When the plaintiff had written part of the work, the defendant abandoned the project. The plaintiff was held entitled to sue for the work already done because the plaintiff's claim was-
Consider the following statements and point out which of them is correct?
1. An Agreement made without consideration is void.
2. Consideration should have some value in the eyes of the law.
3. Consideration has to be adequate.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?