Which provision of the Evidence Act relates to presumption as to documents thirty years old (Ancient documents)?
A. Section 89
B. Section 90
C. Section 90A
D. Section 91
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Court can presume about the legality of digital signature on electronic record under Indian Evidence Act, 1872 when it is
A. 30 years old
B. 15 years old
C. 5 years old
D. 12 years old
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
An item of evidence which is not a secondary evidence is
A. Copies made from the original
B. Copies compared with the original
C. Oral accounts of the contents of a document given by a person who himself has seen it
D. Counter part of a document as against the person who executed it
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Section 81A was added in the Indian Evidence Act by the Information Technology Act, 2000 to provide the presumption as to
A. Electronic agreements
B. Electronic messages
C. Electronic records
D. Gazettes in electronic forms
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Evidence Act-In which decision the five golden principle (panchasheel) about the circumstantial evidence has been laid down?
A. Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1984 SC 1622
B. Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh v. State of V. P., AIR 1954 SC 322
C. State of Uttar Pradesh v. M. K. Anthony, AIR 1985 SC 48
D. Shankari Prasad v. Union of India, AIR 1951 SC 455
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Which document is not admissible without formal proof?
A. Admitted Document
B. Medical Report
C. Report of Chief Inspector of Explosives
D. Report of a Director of the Fingerprint Bureau
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
In which one among the following cases the Supreme Court of India said that 'it is not an absolute rule of law that dying declaration must be corroborated by other evidence before it can be acted upon'?
A. Sharad Birdhichand Sharda v. State of Maharashtra
B. Pakala Narayan Swami v. King Emperor
C. Kaushal Rao v. State of Bombay
D. Harjit Kaur v. State of Punjab
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
A co-defendant in a case
A. Cannot be cross-examined by another co-defendant under any circumstance
B. Can be cross-examined by another co-defendant if their interests are identical
C. Can be cross-examined by another co-defendant when their interests adverse to each other
D. Can be cross-examined by another co-defendant as a matter of right
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Which one of the following Sections of the Indian Evidence Act provides questions lawful in cross-examination to be asked?
A. Section 146
B. Section 145
C. Section 144
D. Section 147
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
The examination of a witness by the adverse party shall be called his
A. Examination-in-chief
B. Cross examination
C. Re-examination
D. Examination on facts
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
As per Section 141 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 a "Leading question" means
A. Any question informing the answer
B. Any question suggesting the answer
C. Any question directing the answer
D. Any question declaring the answer
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Which one of the following is not the pre-requisite of presumption as to dowry-death under Section 113B of Indian Evidence Act?
A. Victim was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or relatives
B. Victim had illicit relationship with other male person
C. Such cruelty or harassment was for connections with any demand for dowry
D. It was done within 7 years of the marriage
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Necessity rule' as to the admissible of evidence is contained in
A. Section 31 of Evidence Act
B. Section 32 of Evidence Act
C. Section 60 of Evidence Act
D. Section 61 of Evidence Act
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Conspiracy means
A. An act done b few person
B. An act of illegal nature
C. An act of legal nature by illegal means
D. All of above
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Which one of the following case is directly related to Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act?
A. Pulukuri kottayya and others v. Emperor
B. Pakala Narayan Swami v. King Emperor
C. State of Maharashtra v. Damu Gopinath Sinde
D. Palvinder Kaur v. State of Punjab
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Recovery made by the police under section 27 of the Evidence Act recording the formal arrest of the accused is . . . . . . . .
A. Legal
B. Illegal
C. Irregular
D. Improper
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
The question is, whether a certain document was written by A. In this case which of the following is/are relevant?
A. Another document is produced which is written by A
B. The opinion of experts on the question whether the two documents were written by A
C. The opinion of experts on the question whether the two documents were written by different persons
D. Both B and C
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Chapter V of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 deals with
A. Oral evidence
B. Documentary evidence
C. Burden of proof
D. Witnesses
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Which of the following is relevant and may be received in evidence?
A. Tape recordings
B. Dog-tracking
C. Narco analysis test
D. All the above
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
In which of the following cases constitutionality of Section 27 was challenged for violation of Article 20(3) of the Constitution?
A. State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu
B. Mirza Akbar v. King Emperor
C. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Deoman Upadhaya
D. Queen Emperor v. Abdullah
Select an option to see the answer and solution.