X, a blacksmith, is seized by a gang of dacoits and forced, by threat of instant death to take his tools and forced him to open the door of Y's house. The dacoits then looted Y's money and jewels and also killed Y's son Z. What offence, among the following offences under Indian Penal Code, 1860 has been committed by X?
B with the intent of temporarily use W's money and later on return it, instructs C, his six years old son, to take away W's purse containing Rs. 20,000 without W's consent. C carried out the instructions. The criminal liability in this case is:
Section 34 of Indian Penal Code provides for liability based on common intention. Consider the following situations:
1. The weapon used in the offence was found in A's house
2. A has procured the weapon of offence voluntarily to aid the criminal gang
3. A was compelled under threat to his life to procure the weapon of offence
4. The weapon was supplied on receipt of value of the weapon (sale)
Which of the situation given above reflect(s) the correct ingredients with regard to Section 34?
The maximum punishment that can be inflicted for offence punishable under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) of Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in case of repeat offenders is
X having delivered money to his servant to carry to a distant place, disguises himself and robs the servant on the high road with an intent to charge him. X commits the offence of
Under which one of the following Sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, an assault or criminal force used in attempting to commit theft of property is punishable?