Printing or publishing of the name or any matter which may make known the identity of the victim of offences under section 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, 376D or Section 376E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, is not permissible if the:
Which of the following combinations are not correctly matched?
1. Sherras v. De Rutzen - Mens rea
2. Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor - Intoxication
3. Abhayadnand Misra v. State of Bihar - Right to die
4. Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab - Criminal attempt
Select correct answer:
A minor girl had left the protection of her father, knowing and having capacity to know the full import of what she was doing voluntarily, joined the accused. Accused allowed the minor to accompany. Accused would be liable for:
P' was picked up by a gang of robbers in a car from the street. He was given a revolver and asked to shoot at 'M'. When 'P' resisted, a revolver was put on his ear and he was told that if he did not shoot, he would be shot dead. Then 'P' shot 'M' dead. On a charge of murder, 'P' argued that his act was not voluntary nor was there mens rea. 'P' is guilty of:
Which of the following statement/statements is/are incorrect?
1. Nothing is offence which is done in exercise of right of Private Defence under Indian Penal Code
2. A person has right to defend his own body only and not the body of other
3. Right of Private Defence is extended to cause death in defamation case
4. A person has even right of Private Defence where there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities
"To preserve one's life is generally speaking a duty, but it may be the highest duty to sacrifice it." This observation was made in Queen v. Dudley and Stephens by
Public Servants who knowingly disobey legal provisions regulating the manner in which they are to conduct investigation into an offence or who fail to record information given to them under relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 shall be punishable with