A' by putting 'Z' in fear of grievous hurt dishonestly induces 'Z' to sign or affix his seal to a blank paper and deliver it to 'A'. 'Z' sign and delivers the paper to 'A'. 'A' is guilty:
A is accused of an act which may amount to theft, or receiving stolen property or criminal teach of trust or cheating. He is only charged with theft but it appears that he committed the offence of criminal breach of trust. He may be:
"A", a blacksmith is seized by a gang of dacoits and compelled by threat of instant death to force open the door of Z's house to enter and plunder it. While committing dacoity, one of the dacoits kills Z's son. A is guilty of
Consider the following statements:
1. In conspiracy, it is in the fact of combination that the unlawfulness resides, combination to injure gives cause of action
2. Where the element of combination is absent, the motive is immaterial
3. Combination for legitimate promotion of their interests give no cause of action
Which of the above statements are correct?
Assertion (A): In a criminal trial, the accused and the defendant mean the same thing
Reason (R): It depends which way you look, for the prosecution a person is accused, for the person he is defendant against the accusation:
A' takes some ornaments belonging to 'B' out of B's possession without B's consent with the intention of keeping it until he obtains money from 'B' as a reward for its restoration. 'A' is
Which of the following statements are correct in relation to criminal conspiracy?
1. When two or more persons agree to do an unlawful act by an unlawful means then they will be guilty of criminal conspiracy
2. Several persons agreed to commit an "offence" but nothing was done in pursuance of the agreement
3. When two or more persons agree to do a lawful act in lawful manner by lawful means but an overt act is done by one them
4. Criminal conspiracy to commit and offence punishable with fine alone will not entail any liability
Select the correct answer:
Under which among the following cases, the Supreme Court held that woman can be arrested by police at any time and even in absence of lady constable if the arresting officer records the proper reason for such arrest?