X' puts gold coins into a box belonging to Z, with intention that they may found in that box, and that this circumstance may cause Z to be convicted of theft. What offence X committed under Indian Penal Code, 1860?
Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to have committed under Indian Penal Code, 1860, the offence(s) of:
A six year old boy kills a fellow boy with a knife. According to Indian Penal Code, he is not liable to be prosecuted and punished for the killing. Is he a person? He is
Preparation and Attempt are two stages for commission of an offence. Preparation is generally not punishable. The reason for making preparation not punishable is:
If an accused takes the plea of his case being covered under any of the "General Exceptions" provided under Chapter IV, Indian Penal Code, the burden of proof in that case lies-
Under Section 57 of Indian Penal Code, in calculating fractions of terms of punishment, 'imprisonment for life' shall be reckoned as equivalent to imprisonment for:
Consider the following statement and identify the correct answer: Statement I: A, the owner of a watch, gives his watch for repair against a charge to B. A however, took away the watch after repairing without paying any charge and without the consent of B. A has made himself liable for the offence of theft as he has acted with dishonest intention at the time of taking his watch back. Statement II: The offence of theft is an offence against possession.
X is at work with hatchet, the head of hatchet files off and kills a man Y who was stand by. Here, if there is no want of proper caution on the part pf X, has act is:
With an intention to cause bodily injury, A hit B with a lathi. He gave six blows, one of which hit B on his head as a result of which B died after 20 days. A guilty of:
As per Section 195A of Indian Penal Code which was inserted by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2005 the offence of threatening any person to give false evidence, is punishable with
X' a rich person residing at Kochi, sends Rs. 50,000 to his agent at Chennai with a direction that the money be given equally to two poor students 'A' and 'B' who are studying in the Engineering College over there. Instead of doing so, the agent gives the money equally to two other very poor deserving students. The agent has committed:
Consider the following statements:
To Justify as a defence to a charge of crime:
1. Irresistible impulse per se is no defence to a charge of crime.
2. Diminished responsibility is a defence to a charge of a crime.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
X' induces a 16 year old girl to go to a particular office where she will have to face an interview as a formality for a promised job. As planned by 'X', the minor girl was forced to illicit intercourse by the man whom she was supposed to meet at that place. The offence committed by 'X' will squarely fall within the ambit of which one of the following Sections of the Indian Penal Code?
