A, a police officer, has a warrant of arrest for B. He asks C as to the identity of B. C knowingly tells A that P is B and consequently A arrests P. C is guilty of:
The Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 (10 of 2009) with effect from 27 October, 2009 which amended the Indian Penal Code in section 464, substituted "Electronic Signature" for
A is attacked by a mob who attempt to murder him. He cannot effectually exercise his right of private defence without firing on the mob, and he cannot fire without risk of harming young children who are mingled with the crowd.
A' a soldier, fires on a mob by the order of his superior officers in conformity with the commands of the Law. A has committed no offence, his defence comes under section . . . . . . . . of Indian Penal Code
X was ill-treated by her in-laws including her husband H. After some time, she decided to leave her in-laws' house and jumps into a well along with her only child C, who she thought will not be taken care of by his uncaring father after her death. X jumped into the well along with C. C died but X was saved. X is liable for:
A is in the house which is on fire, with Z, a child. People, below hold out a blanket. A drops the child in good faith intending the child's benefit. But the child is killed by the fall. A has committed
Principle: The Indian Penal Code makes preparation to wage war against the Government punishable. Factual Situation: X, the chairman of a political party during an election campaign alleged that the ruling party was responsible for inflation, increase in crimes and all other evils that prevailed in the country and hence, exalted his party members to overthrow the present government
A' is carried off by a tiger. 'Z' fires at the tiger in good faith intending to rescue 'A', knowing it to be likely that the shot may kill 'A'. The shot fired by 'Z' gives 'A' a mortal wound. 'Z' has committed