Q181
Open questionThe expression 'Constitutional Tart' means
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Law · all questionsLaw Of Torts
Law Of Torts
practice.
Practice every MCQ with options. Use Show answers when you want the correct option and solution.
920
Questions
10/46
Page
Pick an option on a question to see the right answer and solution.
Q182
Open questionThe defendant had filed a complaint to the Magistrate against the plaintiff. The complaint was dismissed. The defendant moved the Sessions Judge in appeal. He got himself examined in Sessions trial although he knew the charge was false and he was acting without reasonable and probable cause. His complaint was dismissed by the Session Judge. Thereupon the plaintiff filed a suit for malicious prosecution against the defendant.
In the aforesaid case, which one of the following conclusion in correct?
In the aforesaid case, which one of the following conclusion in correct?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q183
Open questionSalmond has defined 'tort' as
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q184
Open questionVolenti non fit injuria implies
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q185
Open questionRailway authorities allowed a train to be overcrowded. In consequence, a legitimate passenger Mr. X got his pocket picked. Choose the most appropriate answer.
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q186
Open questionWhich of the following cases is an authority on "rescue cases" - an exception to maxim volenti non fit injuria?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q187
Open questionA' hires a car on rental from 'B' at Kolkata for going to Varanasi. 'A' takes the car but rides to Bhubaneswar instead. On the way to Bhubaneswar, the car met with an accident. 'A' is liable to pay compensation for
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q188
Open questionWhich of the following is not a valid defence in Torts?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q189
Open questionThe test of reasonable foresight in determining the remoteness of damages was first applied in
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q190
Open questionB' was under the regular employment of 'A' as a driver of his mobile crane. He let the crane together with 'B' as driver to 'C'. In the course of loading a ship, 'X' was injured by negligent working of the crane by 'B'. At the time of the accident 'C' had the immediate control and direction of the operations to be executed. The working of the crane and the manipulation of its control, however, remained with 'B', In a suit by 'X' against 'C', is:
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q191
Open questionLast opportunity rule is
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q192
Open questionRule of Foreseeability Test' for damages in the law of torts was laid down in
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q193
Open questionIn what branch of, law does the principle 'res ipsa loquitor' applies?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q194
Open questionWhich one of the following definitions correctly reflects the nature of Tort?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q195
Open questionVolenti non fit injuria is
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q196
Open questionIn which of the following cases, Justice Kennedy's limitation to the claims relating to nervous shock that "the shock must have been due to fear of immediate personal injury to oneself" was rejected?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q197
Open questionIn which of the following cases, it is not nuisance?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q198
Open questionDr. Abrath v. North-East Railway Co., 1886 AC is a case which is related with the torts of
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q199
Open questionIn "Negligence", a defendant can take the defence of
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q200
Open questionIn which case following facts were given: The defendants employed independent contractors to construct a reservoir on their land which was separated from the plaintiff's colliery by intervening land. Unknown to them beneath the site of the reservoir, there were some disused shafts connecting their land with the plaintiff's mine. The independent contractors were negligent in failing to discover this. Water from the reservoir burst through the shafts and flooded the plaintiff's mine. The defendants were held personally liable, despite the absence of blame in themselves
Select an option to see the answer and solution.