Law Of Torts
practice.

The vicarious liability arising from relation is:-

X wants to purchase Y's car and drives it to test it with Y seated by his side. Because of X's negligence an accident occurs and "Z" is injured. Z sues Y for damages. In this case:

Which one of the following is a ground for rejection of defence of fair comment in the tort of defamation?

X bought a bottle of soft drink and poured one half of contents in a glass and drank It. When she poured the remaining contents a decomposed body of snail floated above. X became sick and claimed damages against the manufacturing company.

Prosecution' under tort of 'malicious prosecution' means

X was using Y's garage for parking his car. One day when Y's servant M was transferring some petrol from a drum to another car, he struck a match to light his cigarette and threw the lighted match stick on the floor which caused fire in the garage and Y's car was gutted. X sued Y for damages for the negligence of his servant.

In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India give a ruling that sovereign immunity of the State is subject to the fundamental rights?

'A' gave some cash and cheques to his friend 'B' who was an employee of the State Bank of India, to deposit the same in the Bank in the account of 'A'. 'B' misappropriated the amount. If 'A', 'B' misappropriated the amount. If 'A' sues the Bank for damages, then the Bank is:

The principle 'ubi jus ibi remedium' was recognised in

The principle of privity of contract was held to be not applicable in an action for tort in

Principle: A person who voluntarily takes a decision to do something after appreciating the risk involved in such act and then receives an injury, will not be entitled to get any compensation.
Facts: 'X', an electrical engineer, was invited by his friend 'Y', to the factory where he was employed. While they were in the factory, 'Q' a worker in the factory informed 'Y' about some short-circuit in the power room. Hearing this, 'Y' asked 'X' to stay in the office room and rushed to the power room. 'X' however, decided to follow 'Y'. 'X' noticed that if the power supply through a particular electric line could be disconnected, the electrical leakage could be stopped which would prevent further damage. Suddenly 'X' decided to pullout the wire manually even though it was risky. This resulted in a blast in which both 'X' and 'Y' got injured. 'X' had to spend Rs. 1 lakh at the hospital for his treatment. 'X' wants to file a suit for compensation from the management of the factory. Will he succeed?

Y purchases a bottle of cold drink from a retailer. The bottle was contaminated and Y fell ill after drinking it. Y brings a suit for damages against the manufacturer of the cold drink. Y will

Under the Law of torts, the damages are

The 'act of God' or 'Vis major' is

"Where an inn-keeper seizes the goods of his guest, who has failed to pay his bill, there is an acquisition of possession against the will of previous possessor, but it is a rightful taking of possession . . . . where a thief steals a watch, this is still an acquisition of possession against the will of the true owner, but it is wrongful i.e. not in pursuance of legal right." This statement was given by-

An army truck driven by an army driver, while going to check the armymen on duties, hit X, a pedestrian, and injured him seriously on account of rash and negligent driving. M sued the Government of India. The defence was a sovereign functions.

Which of the following statement is incorrect:

In which of the following cases it is not nuisance:

Which of the following is a correct definition of trespass to land?

Where a person willfully and without any justification is dealing with the goods in such a manner that another person, who is entitled to its immediate use and possession of the same, is deprived of that, is known as