Q381
Open questionThe expression 'unable to entertain' in Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963 is equivalent to which of the following?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Law · all questionsLimitation Act
Limitation Act
practice.
Practice every MCQ with options. Use Show answers when you want the correct option and solution.
488
Questions
20/25
Page
Pick an option on a question to see the right answer and solution.
Q382
Open questionExpiry of period of limitation
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q383
Open questionNo court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable with fine only, after the expiry of the period of limitation of
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q384
Open questionIn which section of the Limitation Act, 1963 provisions relating to exclusion of time in cases where leave to sue or appeal as a pauper is applied?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q385
Open questionSelect correct one of the following
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q386
Open questionWhere the prescribed period of limitation for any application is expiring on a holiday, the application:
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q387
Open questionUnder Limitation Act, the period of limitation for any suit or application shall be deemed to be extended for a maximum period of . . . . . . . . from the death of the person affected by disability -
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q388
Open questionWhich of the following is true about the right to pay court-fee under Section 13, Limitation Act, 1963?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q389
Open questionPeriod of limitation for suits not specifically provided under the Schedule is
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q390
Open questionPeriod of limitation for suits relating to declarations is
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q391
Open questionRead the following statements:
(1) The Supreme Court in N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy, (1998) 7 SCC 123 refuse to condone the delay on the ground of sufficient cause
(2) In the case of R. B. Ramalingum v. R. B. Bhuwaneshwari, (2009) 2 SCC 689, the Supreme Court observed that the test of sufficient cause is purely an individuals test of the above:
(1) The Supreme Court in N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy, (1998) 7 SCC 123 refuse to condone the delay on the ground of sufficient cause
(2) In the case of R. B. Ramalingum v. R. B. Bhuwaneshwari, (2009) 2 SCC 689, the Supreme Court observed that the test of sufficient cause is purely an individuals test of the above:
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q392
Open questionThe delay of 105 days beyond the prescribed time in applying for setting aside of the Arbitral Award pursuant to an Arbitration Agreement dated 1st November, 2017
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q393
Open questionMark the correct statement.
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q394
Open questionLaw of limitation is:
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q395
Open questionThe provisions of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 regarding extention of prescribed period are not applicable to
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q396
Open questionWhich section of the Limitation Act, 1963 provides that on lapse of time not only the remedy is barred but the right to property is also extinguished?
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q397
Open questionTime requisite' under Section 12(2) of Limitation Act means
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q398
Open questionA party who prays for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has to establish that:
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q399
Open questionDelay in filing the suit:
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Q400
Open questionLaw of limitation: Mark the incorrect statement.
Select an option to see the answer and solution.