In case of a suit by a person excluded from a joint family property to enforce a right to share therein, the time from which the period of limitation (12 years under Article 110 of the Schedule of the Limitation Act, 1963) begins to run is
A. From the date of exclusion
B. When the exclusion becomes known to the plaintiff
C. When the plaintiff makes known his intention to recover possession
D. The date of refusal to hand over possession to the plaintiff
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
What is the period of limitation for a suit by or on behalf of government of India or a state government?
A. Sixty years
B. Twelve years
C. Thirty years
D. Six years
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
In which section of Indian Limitation Act, effect of death before accrual of right to sue is provided?
A. Section 16
B. Section 18
C. Section 19
D. Section 20
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
What is legal disability under The Limitation Act?
A. Permanent physical disability
B. Partial but serious physical disability
C. Disability due to poverty
D. None of the above
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Easement has been defined under which section of the Limitation Act, 1963
A. Section 2(f)
B. Section 2(g)
C. Section 3(g)
D. Section 3(f)
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
In the matters of condonation of delay under section 5, Limitation Act 1963, relating to Government
A. Strict proof of everyday's delay by the Government should not be insisted upon
B. Strict proof of everyday's delay by the Government should be insisted upon
C. Strict proof of everyday's delay by the Government may not be insisted upon
D. Strict proof of everyday's delay by the Government may be insisted upon
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Which of the following is correct with regard to acknowledgement of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963?
A. Acknowledgement cannot be undated
B. Acknowledgement can be made to a person other than the person entitled to the property
C. Acknowledgement need not be in writing
D. Acknowledgement can be made after the expiry of the period of limitation
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Statement A - In computing period of limitation for any appeal, the day from which such period is to be reckoned, shall be included.
Statement B - In computing period of limitation for any appeal, the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced and the time requisite for obtaining the copy of the decree shall be excluded.
A. Statement A is correct
B. Statement B is correct
C. Both are correct
D. Both are incorrect
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Before expiry of period of limitation, 'A' has acknowledged in writing the amount due as debt from 'B' and has promised to pay. What is the effect of such an acknowledgement?
A. No effect on period of limitation
B. Fresh period of limitation will start from date of such an acknowledgement
C. Period of limitation will be extended for six months
D. Period of limitation will not be applicable
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
If a plaintiff takes possession of disputed shop by way of part performance, it is not open to him to take plea that he acquired title by
A. Adverse possession
B. Physical possession
C. Corporeal possession
D. Exclusive possession
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Section 15 of the Limitation Act applies to:
A. Suits and execution applications
B. Suits only
C. Execution applications only
D. Appeals
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
The benefit of section 14 of Limitation Act is available to the plaintiff
A. Where a suit has been withdrawn under Order XXIII, Rule 1 of CPC (Code of Civil Procedure) without seeking permission to file a fresh one
B. Where a suit has been withdrawn under Order XXIII, Rule 1 of CPC (Code of Civil Procedure) with permission to file a fresh one
C. Both (A) and (B)
D. Neither (A) nor (B)
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
After the institution of a suit, a new defendant is substituted. The suit is deemed to have been instituted as regards him:
A. When he was made a party
B. When the suit was instituted
C. Fresh period of limitation to be reckoned
D. None of these
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Limitation Act:- The period of limitation for preferring an appeal from a decree passed by a court subordinate to the High Court to a High Court from the date of the decree is:
A. 90 days
B. 60 Days
C. 30 days
D. One year
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Time excluded has to be considered on the basis of
A. Information available from the copy of judgment/decree placed on record
B. Information as to copies obtained by the parties for court purposes
C. Information as to copies obtained by the parties for other purposes
D. Information as to copies not placed on record but made available to the court
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
For condonation of delay under section 5, Limitation Act, 1963
A. Length of delay is the only criterion
B. Length of delay is no matter, acceptability of the explanation is the only criterion
C. Length of delay certainly matters apart from the acceptability of the explanation
D. Either (A) or (C)
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Under the Limitation Act, the period of limitation for filing an application for an order to set aside an abatement is:
A. 60 days
B. 90 days
C. 120 days
D. None of the above
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Which of the following are regarded as Courts for the purposes of Section 14, Limitation Act, 1963?
A. Revenue Courts
B. Court of Wards under Jaipur Court of Wards Act, 1925
C. Both (A) and (B)
D. None of these
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
Period of limitation for suits relating to decrees & instruments is
A. 1 year
B. 1 year to 3 years
C. 3 years
D. 12 years
Select an option to see the answer and solution.
The plaintiff is entitled to get the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 provided:
A. That the suit must not have been entertained by the former court for want of jurisdiction
B. That the plaintiff must be prosecuting his suit with due diligence and in good faith
C. Either (A) or (B)
D. Both (A) and (B)
E. None of these
Select an option to see the answer and solution.